Williams v. Gilmore, 18-0238. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190422765
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa ("Report and Recommendation") (Doc. 25), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The
Summary: ORDER PETRESE B. TUCKER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa ("Report and Recommendation") (Doc. 25), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The p..
More
ORDER
PETRESE B. TUCKER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa ("Report and Recommendation") (Doc. 25), and Petitioner's Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and
4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.
Source: Leagle
