Finch v. Berryhill, 18-4074. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190423d06
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 18 th of April, 2019 upon consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review, the Commisioner's Response thereto, Plaintiff's Reply thereto, and for the reasons in today's Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED; 2. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED; 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner so that the ALJ can pose a hypothetical question to a vocational e
Summary: ORDER CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS , Magistrate Judge . AND NOW, this 18 th of April, 2019 upon consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review, the Commisioner's Response thereto, Plaintiff's Reply thereto, and for the reasons in today's Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED; 2. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED; 3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner so that the ALJ can pose a hypothetical question to a vocational ex..
More
ORDER
CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS, Magistrate Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th of April, 2019 upon consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Review, the Commisioner's Response thereto, Plaintiff's Reply thereto, and for the reasons in today's Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED;
2. The Commissioner's final decision is REVERSED;
3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner so that the ALJ can pose a hypothetical question to a vocational expert that accurately contains all of Plaintiff's credible limitations, including her moderate limitation in the ability to concentrate, persist or maintain pace;
4. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff, Tangela Finch.
Source: Leagle
