Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stoltzfus v. Berryhill, 16-6308. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190503h27 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 01, 2019
Latest Update: May 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 26th day of April 2019, upon consideration of the administrative record, Plaintiff's request for review, Defendant's response, Plaintiff's reply, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, and the objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk is directed to REMOVE the case from Civil Suspense; 2. The Objections to the Report and Recommendation are
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of April 2019, upon consideration of the administrative record, Plaintiff's request for review, Defendant's response, Plaintiff's reply, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, and the objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk is directed to REMOVE the case from Civil Suspense;

2. The Objections to the Report and Recommendation are SUSTAINED in part;

3. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion;

4. The Plaintiff's request for reversal is GRANTED; and

5. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further review consistent with the Report and Recommendation and the accompanying Memorandum Opinion pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

It is so ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer