Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Muhammad v. Commissioner of Social Security, 18-03230. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190507555 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Raphael Rahmon Muhammad's Request for Review (Doc. No. 7), the Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 11), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12), to which no objections were filed, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 1 2.
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff Raphael Rahmon Muhammad's Request for Review (Doc. No. 7), the Defendant's Response (Doc. No. 11), and the administrative record, and after careful consideration of Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12), to which no objections were filed, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;1 2. Judgment is entered affirming the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Plaintiffs Request for Review (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED; and 3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.

FootNotes


1. Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.1(IV) and 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1), Mr. Muhammad had fourteen (14) days to object to the Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation was issued on February 26, 2019, and Mr. Muhammad has not objected to it.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer