Anderson v. United States Postal Service, 19-262. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190702c94
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 1st day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) (Document No. 17), the plaintiffs' response in opposition, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to the defendants United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan and the United States of America for lac
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE , District Judge . NOW, this 1st day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) (Document No. 17), the plaintiffs' response in opposition, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to the defendants United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan and the United States of America for lack..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, District Judge.
NOW, this 1st day of July, 2019, upon consideration of the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) (Document No. 17), the plaintiffs' response in opposition, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED as to the defendants United States Postal Service, Megan J. Brennan and the United States of America for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle
