Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Berg v. Berryhill, 17-04452. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190729903 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER GERALD J. PAPPERT , District Judge . AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Statement of Issues (ECF No. 14), Defendant's Response (ECF No. 17), Plaintiff's Reply (ECF No. 19), Magistrate Judge Hey's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20), Plaintiff's Objections (ECF No. 20), Defendant's Response (ECF No. 23) and the Administrative Record (ECF No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED; 2. Magistrate Judge Hey's
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of July, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Statement of Issues (ECF No. 14), Defendant's Response (ECF No. 17), Plaintiff's Reply (ECF No. 19), Magistrate Judge Hey's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 20), Plaintiff's Objections (ECF No. 20), Defendant's Response (ECF No. 23) and the Administrative Record (ECF No. 11), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED; 2. Magistrate Judge Hey's Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The Commissioner of Social Security's decision is AFFIRMED and relief sought by Plaintiff is DENIED; and 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer