Wilborn v. Barr, 18-3597. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20190809e74
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5 th day of August, 2019, after reviewing Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 1 (Docket No. 2), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. FootNotes 1. After a Rule 16 conference with counsel for all parties, this Court determined that no further discovery was necessary and converted Plaintiff's Motion
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5 th day of August, 2019, after reviewing Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 1 (Docket No. 2), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. FootNotes 1. After a Rule 16 conference with counsel for all parties, this Court determined that no further discovery was necessary and converted Plaintiff's Motion f..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2019, after reviewing Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment1 (Docket No. 2), all supporting and opposing papers, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED.
FootNotes
1. After a Rule 16 conference with counsel for all parties, this Court determined that no further discovery was necessary and converted Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 2) to a Motion for Summary Judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Parties were permitted to submit additional supplemental authority and material pertinent to the motion, and this Court conducted an oral argument on the motion for summary judgment on April 4, 2018.
Source: Leagle
