Filed: Aug. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 23rd of August, 2019, upon consideration of the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75), the parties' responses and replies (Doc. Nos. 80, 89, 90, 96, and 97), and the defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98), and following an oral argument on June 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that: 1. The defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Court shall docke
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 23rd of August, 2019, upon consideration of the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75), the parties' responses and replies (Doc. Nos. 80, 89, 90, 96, and 97), and the defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98), and following an oral argument on June 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that: 1. The defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of Court shall docket..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 23rd of August, 2019, upon consideration of the defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75), the parties' responses and replies (Doc. Nos. 80, 89, 90, 96, and 97), and the defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98), and following an oral argument on June 14, 2019, it is ORDERED that:
1. The defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98) is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of Court shall docket Exhibit A to the defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Surreply (Doc. No. 98-1) as the defendants' Surreply Brief in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment; and
3. The defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 75) is DENIED as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum.
