Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Schall v. Ronak Foods, 2:19-cv-01463-JDW. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20190828d89 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOSHUA D. WOLSON , District Judge . AND NOW, this 27 th day of August, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment (ECF No. 9), and for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Motion for a Default Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff Samantha Schall and against Defendant Ronak Foods d/b/a Pizza Hut as to Count II of Plaintiff's Compl
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of August, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Request for Default Judgment (ECF No. 9), and for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Memorandum, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for a Default Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff Samantha Schall and against Defendant Ronak Foods d/b/a Pizza Hut as to Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint, in the amount of $88,326.61.

2. Plaintiff is not entitled to a default judgment with respect to Count I.

3. To the extent they have a basis to do so, Plaintiff's attorneys shall file a petition for attorneys' fees and costs within fourteen days of the date of this Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer