Palmero v. Marsh, 18-cv-3538. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191024d21
Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 22nd day of October, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Petitioner's Objections, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 i
Summary: ORDER GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH , District Judge . This 22nd day of October, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Petitioner's Objections, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is..
More
ORDER
GERALD AUSTIN McHUGH, District Judge.
This 22nd day of October, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, and Petitioner's Objections, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
