Filed: Oct. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Leave to Supplement Preliminary Injunction Record, and to Alter, Amend or Seek Relief from the Court's July 25, 2019 Order (Doc. No. 76), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 83), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 85), and oral argument held on September 12, 2019, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as fol
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Leave to Supplement Preliminary Injunction Record, and to Alter, Amend or Seek Relief from the Court's July 25, 2019 Order (Doc. No. 76), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 83), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 85), and oral argument held on September 12, 2019, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as foll..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Leave to Supplement Preliminary Injunction Record, and to Alter, Amend or Seek Relief from the Court's July 25, 2019 Order (Doc. No. 76), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 83), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 85), and oral argument held on September 12, 2019, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 76) is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as follows:
1. The exhibits accompanying Defendants' Motion (Doc. No. 76) will not supplement the preliminary injunction record;
2. The Court's grant of Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction in its July 25, 2019 Order (Doc. No. 67) is VACATED;
3. Defendants will no longer be enjoined from selling GRISHKO-branded products in the United States; and
4. Plaintiff shall not be required to post a bond.
