Matthews v. Norristown States Hospital, 13-218. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191106f22
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5 th day of November, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Response and Supplemental Response and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, and with no objections being filed thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for writ of habeas co
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 5 th day of November, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Response and Supplemental Response and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, and with no objections being filed thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 2. The petition for writ of habeas cor..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 5th day of November, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Response and Supplemental Response and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, and with no objections being filed thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle
