Pennsylvania v. Think Finance, Inc., 14-7139. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191122e87
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 255), Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 259-2), and the Responses and Replies thereto; Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 256 and 257) and the Responses and Replies thereto; Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 262) and the Responses an
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 255), Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 259-2), and the Responses and Replies thereto; Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 256 and 257) and the Responses and Replies thereto; Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 262) and the Responses and..
More
ORDER
J. CURTIS JOYNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 255), Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 259-2), and the Responses and Replies thereto; Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 256 and 257) and the Responses and Replies thereto; Plaintiff's Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 262) and the Responses and Replies thereto; and Defendant NCA's Statement of Undisputed Material Facts (Doc. No. 256), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the preceding Memorandum Opinion.
Source: Leagle
