Hamilton v. Wilmac Corp., 18-1141. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191210807
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 21), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22), and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED with prejudice with respect to Ms. Hamilton's claims against Wilmac Corpor
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 21), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22), and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED with prejudice with respect to Ms. Hamilton's claims against Wilmac Corpora..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 21), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22), and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 24), it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED with prejudice with respect to Ms. Hamilton's claims against Wilmac Corporation;
2. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED with prejudice with respect to Ms. Hamilton's failure-to-hire claim against Attleboro Nursing and Rehab Center; and
3. The Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22) is DENIED with respect to Ms. Hamilton's failure-to-accommodate claim against Attleboro Nursing and Rehab Center.
Source: Leagle
