Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Spring Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Retrophin, Inc., 18-4553. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20191213c44 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER J. CURTIS JOYNER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 39, 40, 42, 43) and the Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Retrophin, Mission, and Alamo (Doc. Nos. 40, 42) are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part with leave to amend. 2. Defendant Shkreli's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 39, 43) is STAYED for ninety days from the date of this Order
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2019, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 39, 40, 42, 43) and the Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Motions to Dismiss of Defendants Retrophin, Mission, and Alamo (Doc. Nos. 40, 42) are DENIED in part and GRANTED in part with leave to amend. 2. Defendant Shkreli's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 39, 43) is STAYED for ninety days from the date of this Order to allow for discovery limited to the jurisdictional issue raised on Defendant Shkreli's Motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). 3. On conclusion of limited discovery, Plaintiff Spring and Defendant Shkreli may submit supplemental briefing to bring this matter back before the Court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer