Ismail v. DS Smith Holdings, Inc., 18-2881. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191223f24
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the Plaintiff's Objections, and after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, it is ORDERED : 1. Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 40] are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 36] is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. The joint request to enforce settlement by counsel for the Plaintiff and Def
Summary: ORDER JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the Plaintiff's Objections, and after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, it is ORDERED : 1. Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 40] are OVERRULED. 2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 36] is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 3. The joint request to enforce settlement by counsel for the Plaintiff and Defe..
More
ORDER
JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2019, upon careful and independent consideration of the Plaintiff's Objections, and after de novo review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Objections [Doc. 40] are OVERRULED.
2. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. 36] is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
3. The joint request to enforce settlement by counsel for the Plaintiff and Defendant is granted.
4. The Settlement Agreement attached to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is confirmed and deemed fully enforceable in its entirety.
Source: Leagle
