Filed: Dec. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 23 rd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the pending motions to dismiss and motion to strike and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 30, is GRANTED. 2. The motion to dismiss and motion to strike, ECF No. 31, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. The request to dismiss is granted. b. The request to strike is den
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR. , District Judge . AND NOW , this 23 rd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the pending motions to dismiss and motion to strike and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 30, is GRANTED. 2. The motion to dismiss and motion to strike, ECF No. 31, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: a. The request to dismiss is granted. b. The request to strike is deni..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of December, 2019, upon consideration of the pending motions to dismiss and motion to strike and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The motion to dismiss, ECF No. 30, is GRANTED.
2. The motion to dismiss and motion to strike, ECF No. 31, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
a. The request to dismiss is granted.
b. The request to strike is denied as moot.
3. Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, ECF No. 29, is DISMISSED with prejudice.
4. The case is CLOSED.
