Lee v. Lamas, 19-241. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20191230928
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER CYNTHIA M. RUFE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 26th day of December 2019, upon consideration of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Doc. No. 12], and the responses thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Accordingly, the Defendants shall answer the Complaint no later than January 16, 2020. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 26th day of December 2019, upon consideration of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Doc. No. 12], and the responses thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Accordingly, the Defendants shall answer the Complaint no later than January 16, 2020.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
