Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Smith v. Harrison House, 19-1012. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200121b04 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER WENDY BEETLESTONE , District Judge . AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Harrison House's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support (ECF Nos. 28, 29) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (ECF No. 30), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is decided as follows: 1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count I (Title VII Retaliation) is GRANTED. Count I is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count II (
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Harrison House's Motion to Dismiss and briefing in support (ECF Nos. 28, 29) and Plaintiff's Response in Opposition (ECF No. 30), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is decided as follows:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count I (Title VII Retaliation) is GRANTED. Count I is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count II (Pennsylvania Human Relations Act Discrimination) is GRANTED as it pertains to disability discrimination. Count II's disability claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count III (Pennsylvania Human Relations Act Retaliation) is GRANTED. Count III is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 4. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Count V (Americans with Disabilities Act Retaliation) is GRANTED. Count V is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer