Rankin v. Saldutti, LLC, 19-1508. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200121j14
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of January 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Customers Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 16), Defendant Customers Bank's Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21), and in accordance with the Court's Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that Customers Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' TILA claim
Summary: ORDER JOEL H. SLOMSKY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 17th day of January 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Customers Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 16), Defendant Customers Bank's Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21), and in accordance with the Court's Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that Customers Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' TILA claim ..
More
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 17th day of January 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Customers Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13), Plaintiffs' Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 16), Defendant Customers Bank's Reply to the Response to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 21), and in accordance with the Court's Opinion issued this day, it is ORDERED that Customers Bank's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' TILA claim in Count II of the Complaint is DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
