United States v. Dorman, 04-460 (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200129f24
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. SANCHEZ , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Tyrone Dorman's prose Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody, the Government's opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motion (Document 102) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Dorman has not made a substantial showing of
Summary: ORDER JUAN R. SANCHEZ , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Tyrone Dorman's prose Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody, the Government's opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motion (Document 102) is DENIED. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Dorman has not made a substantial showing of t..
More
ORDER
JUAN R. SANCHEZ, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2020, upon consideration of Defendant Tyrone Dorman's prose Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody, the Government's opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Motion (Document 102) is DENIED.
A certificate of appealability shall not issue because Dorman has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right nor demonstrated that reasonable jurists would debate the correctness of this ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000).
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark the above-captioned cases CLOSED.
Source: Leagle
