Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Roebuck v. Davis, 19-2816. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20200213h76 Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2020
Summary: ORDER JAN E. DuBOIS , District Judge . AND NOW , this 10th day of February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and Officer Ramos' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Document No. 8, filed October 16, 2019) and Plaintiff's Response and Answer to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Document No. 10, filed October 28, 2019), for the reasons stated in the Memorandum dated February 10, 2020, IT IS
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of February, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and Officer Ramos' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Document No. 8, filed October 16, 2019) and Plaintiff's Response and Answer to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Document No. 10, filed October 28, 2019), for the reasons stated in the Memorandum dated February 10, 2020, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority and Officer Ramos' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims against Officer Ramos and SEPTA are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint with respect to his claims against Officer Ramos and SEPTA within twenty (20) days, if warranted by the facts and applicable law as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum dated February 10, 2020.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a preliminary pretrial conference by telephone will be scheduled in due course.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer