Filed: Mar. 02, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 25), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 26), oral argument held on January 17, 2020, and Ms. Dudhi's supplemental briefing submitted after oral argument (Doc. No. 33), it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompan
Summary: ORDER GENE E.K. PRATTER , District Judge . AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 25), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 26), oral argument held on January 17, 2020, and Ms. Dudhi's supplemental briefing submitted after oral argument (Doc. No. 33), it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompany..
More
ORDER
GENE E.K. PRATTER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2020, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22), the Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 25), the Reply in Support (Doc. No. 26), oral argument held on January 17, 2020, and Ms. Dudhi's supplemental briefing submitted after oral argument (Doc. No. 33), it is ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 22) is GRANTED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum;
2. Ms. Dudhi's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
3. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for all purposes, including statistics.
