Lewis v. Pennsylvania, 19-4408. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200311f35
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 10th day of March 2020, upon considering Delaware County's and Detective Tyler's Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 15) a pro se amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 14), without timely Opposition, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED; 2. We dismiss Plaintiffs amended Complaint; 3. As Plaintiffs claims relating to his earlier convictions based on admiralty
Summary: ORDER MARK A. KEARNEY , District Judge . AND NOW, this 10th day of March 2020, upon considering Delaware County's and Detective Tyler's Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 15) a pro se amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 14), without timely Opposition, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED; 2. We dismiss Plaintiffs amended Complaint; 3. As Plaintiffs claims relating to his earlier convictions based on admiralty ..
More
ORDER
MARK A. KEARNEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 10th day of March 2020, upon considering Delaware County's and Detective Tyler's Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 15) a pro se amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 14), without timely Opposition, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1. Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED;
2. We dismiss Plaintiffs amended Complaint;
3. As Plaintiffs claims relating to his earlier convictions based on admiralty law jurisdiction lack merit, we find an amended Complaint is futile; and,
4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
Source: Leagle
