Tucker v. PA, 18-0201. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20200319c72
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of March 2020, upon consideration of: the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); Petitioner's Addendum (ECF No. 11); the Commonwealth's Response thereto (ECF No. 7); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard Lloret (ECF No. 12); Petitioner's Objections thereto (ECF Nos. 15, 17); and, the Commonwealth's Response to Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
Summary: ORDER C. DARNELL JONES, II , District Judge . AND NOW, this 18th day of March 2020, upon consideration of: the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); Petitioner's Addendum (ECF No. 11); the Commonwealth's Response thereto (ECF No. 7); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard Lloret (ECF No. 12); Petitioner's Objections thereto (ECF Nos. 15, 17); and, the Commonwealth's Response to Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: ..
More
ORDER
C. DARNELL JONES, II, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of March 2020, upon consideration of: the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1); Petitioner's Addendum (ECF No. 11); the Commonwealth's Response thereto (ECF No. 7); the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Richard Lloret (ECF No. 12); Petitioner's Objections thereto (ECF Nos. 15, 17); and, the Commonwealth's Response to Petitioner's Objections (ECF No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Petitioner's Objections (ECF Nos. 15, 17) are OVERRULED in accordance with this Court's accompanying Memorandum;
2. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is APPROVED AND ADOPTED;
3. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) is DENIED; and,
4. Petitioner has neither shown denial of a federal constitutional right, nor established that reasonable jurists would disagree with this court's procedural disposition of his claims. Consequently, a Certificate of Appealability shall NOT ISSUE.
Source: Leagle
