Filed: Feb. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss the indictment (Doc. 152), filed pro se by defendant Henry Thompson ("Thompson") on February 6, 2012, and it appearing that defendant is represented by counsel, William Fetterhoff, Esquire, but filed the instant motion without assistance therefrom, see United States v. D'Amario, 268 F. App'x 179, 180 (3d Cir. 2008) ("The Constitution does not confer a right to
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge. AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss the indictment (Doc. 152), filed pro se by defendant Henry Thompson ("Thompson") on February 6, 2012, and it appearing that defendant is represented by counsel, William Fetterhoff, Esquire, but filed the instant motion without assistance therefrom, see United States v. D'Amario, 268 F. App'x 179, 180 (3d Cir. 2008) ("The Constitution does not confer a right to p..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2012, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss the indictment (Doc. 152), filed pro se by defendant Henry Thompson ("Thompson") on February 6, 2012, and it appearing that defendant is represented by counsel, William Fetterhoff, Esquire, but filed the instant motion without assistance therefrom, see United States v. D'Amario, 268 F. App'x 179, 180 (3d Cir. 2008) ("The Constitution does not confer a right to proceed simultaneously by counsel and pro se. ..."); see also United States v. Vampire Nation, 451 F.3d 189, 206 n.17 (3d Cir. 2006), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 152) is DENIED without prejudice to defendant's right to file a motion seeking similar relief with the assistance of counsel or subsequent to the court deeming defendant pro se in the above-captioned matter.
