SHIPMAN v. GELSO, 3:11-CV-1162. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120608e57
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW this 5 th day of June, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser (Doc. 22) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED; (2) The Gelso Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs' Negligence claim; (3) The Gelso Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects; and (4) This matter is
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW this 5 th day of June, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser (Doc. 22) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED; (2) The Gelso Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs' Negligence claim; (3) The Gelso Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects; and (4) This matter is ..
More
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW this 5th day of June, 2012, upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Andrew Smyser (Doc. 22) for plain error or manifest injustice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is ADOPTED;
(2) The Gelso Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs' Negligence claim;
(3) The Gelso Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects; and
(4) This matter is RECOMMITTED to the Magistrate Judge.
Source: Leagle
