GULICK v. CITY OF PITTSTON, 3:12-CV-141. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20120614a19
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 13, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2012
Summary: ORDER A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge. NOW, this 13th day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Defendant City of Pittston's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED. (2) Count II of Plaintiff Greg Gulick's Complaint is DISMISSED. (3) Mr. Gulick has twenty-one (21) days to amend his complaint to properly allege a violation of his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. If he fails to amend his complaint within that period, it will be dismissed with prejudice.
ORDER
A. RICHARD CAPUTO, District Judge.
NOW, this 13th day of June, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant City of Pittston's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is GRANTED.
(2) Count II of Plaintiff Greg Gulick's Complaint is DISMISSED.
(3) Mr. Gulick has twenty-one (21) days to amend his complaint to properly allege a violation of his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. If he fails to amend his complaint within that period, it will be dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
