Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SANDERS v. COUNTY OF BRADFORD, 3:11-1723. (2013)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20130605c62 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2013
Summary: ORDER MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge. For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT : (1) The report and recommendation of Judge Blewitt regarding the Bradford County Defendants, (Doc. No. 64 ), is ADOPTED to the extent that it recommends the motion to dismiss be granted on immunity grounds; (2) Bradford County Defendant's motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 23 ), is GRANTED; (3) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Daniel Barrett from
More

ORDER

MALACHY E. MANNION, District Judge.

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

(1) The report and recommendation of Judge Blewitt regarding the Bradford County Defendants, (Doc. No. 64), is ADOPTED to the extent that it recommends the motion to dismiss be granted on immunity grounds; (2) Bradford County Defendant's motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 23), is GRANTED; (3) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Daniel Barrett from the action; (4) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant The County of Bradford from the action; (5) The report and recommendation of Judge Blewitt regarding the PennDOT Defendants, (Doc. No. 66), is ADOPTED to the extent that it recommends the motion to dismiss be granted on immunity grounds and for failure to state a claim; (6) PennDOT Defendant's motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 24), is GRANTED; (7) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant The Pennsylvania Department of Transportation from the action; (8) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Lizette Harner from the action; (9) The report and recommendation of Judge Blewitt regarding the Montgomery County Defendants, (Doc. No. 67), is ADOPTED to the extent that it recommends the motion to dismiss be granted on immunity grounds and for failure to state a claim with respect to the state employees and Defendant James Vanness. The court declines to adopt the report and recommendation with respect to Defendant Cynthia Dunlap. (10) Montgomery County Defendant's motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 25), is GRANTED; (11) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Montgomery County from the action; (12) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Officers Unknown, Montgomery County from the action; (13) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Risa Vetri Ferman from the action; (14) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant Richard Marsh from the action; (15) The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE Defendant James H. Vanness from the action; (16) The case is REMANDED to Judge Blewitt for further pre-trial case management including dispositive motions.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer