DANSBURY v. EOG RESOURCES, INC., 3:12-CV-00391. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140616b78
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge. AND NOW, THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 40), and in accordance with the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. The Slander of Title claim (Count II) is: i. DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as it refers to the letter of June 21, 2011; and
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge. AND NOW, THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 40), and in accordance with the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows: a. The Slander of Title claim (Count II) is: i. DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as it refers to the letter of June 21, 2011; and ..
More
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge.
AND NOW, THIS 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 40), and in accordance with the Court's accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, as follows:
a. The Slander of Title claim (Count II) is:
i. DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND as it refers to the letter of June 21, 2011; and
ii. ALLOWED TO PROCEED as it refers to Defendant's filing of the unit designations with the Recorder of Deeds.
b. The Breach of Contract claim (Count III) is:
I. DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND as it refers to:
1. Defendant's failure to make delay rental payments, and
2. Defendant's failure to submit aproper notice of consolidation; and
II. ALLOWED TO PROCEED as it refers to:
1. Defendant's failure to test Plaintiffs' water supply, and
2. Defendant's breaches of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and the doctrine of necessary implication.
c. The Unjust Enrichment claim (Count V) is ALLOWED TO PROCEED.
d. Any other aspect of Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint not specifically enumerated in this Order is ALLOWED TO PROCEED.
2. Plaintiffs are GRANTED ADDITIONAL LEAVE TO AMEND to:
a. Reallege the dismissed aspects of their Breach of Contract claim under a proper cause of action, and
b. Add any additional claims that the Court's Memorandum Opinion makes necessary.
3. Plaintiff shall have FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this Order to submit a Third Amended Complaint.
Source: Leagle
