WILLIAMS v. SABOL, 4:13-cv-01962. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140711e03
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. On March 24, 2014, Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) (hereinafter, the "R&R") in which she advised the Court to deny petitioner Williams's petition for a writ of habeas corpus "without prejudice to renewal at such time, if any, as the delay and detention become unreasonable and excessive." Williams did not file objections, so the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and obvious non-conformity with
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge. On March 24, 2014, Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) (hereinafter, the "R&R") in which she advised the Court to deny petitioner Williams's petition for a writ of habeas corpus "without prejudice to renewal at such time, if any, as the delay and detention become unreasonable and excessive." Williams did not file objections, so the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and obvious non-conformity with w..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
On March 24, 2014, Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick issued a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) (hereinafter, the "R&R") in which she advised the Court to deny petitioner Williams's petition for a writ of habeas corpus "without prejudice to renewal at such time, if any, as the delay and detention become unreasonable and excessive." Williams did not file objections, so the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and obvious non-conformity with well-established law. See Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987) (although Court is not required to review magistrate judge's report absent objections, "the better practice is for the district judge to afford some level of review to dispositive legal issues raised by the report"). The Court will adopt the R&R in its entirety.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the March 24, 2014 R&R (ECF No. 11) is ADOPTED and Williams's petition is DENIED without prejudice. This case is remanded to Magistrate Judge Mehalchick.
Source: Leagle
