PULIDO-RODRIGUEZ v. SABOL, 3:13cv3086. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20140804c69
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge. AND NOW, to wit, this 1st day of August 2014, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The petitioner's objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. 11) are OVERRULED; 2) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED; 3) The petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal at such time, if any, that the delay and detention become unreasonable and excessive; 4) The Cler
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge. AND NOW, to wit, this 1st day of August 2014, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) The petitioner's objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. 11) are OVERRULED; 2) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED; 3) The petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal at such time, if any, that the delay and detention become unreasonable and excessive; 4) The Clerk..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, to wit, this 1st day of August 2014, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1) The petitioner's objections to the report and recommendation (Doc. 11) are OVERRULED;
2) The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED;
3) The petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal at such time, if any, that the delay and detention become unreasonable and excessive;
4) The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case; and
5) Based upon the reasoning set forth in the accompanying memorandum, we decline to issue a certificate of appealability.
Source: Leagle