LEE v. CAMERON, 4:08-CV-1972. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150306b10
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. NEALON , District Judge . NOW, THIS 5 th DAY OF MARCH, 2015 , for the reasons stated in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The rationale of the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 109), is ADOPTED ; 2. Petitioner's motion for an indicative ruling under Rule 62.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the writ has become absolute, (Doc. 107), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ; and 3. The matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Ca
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM J. NEALON , District Judge . NOW, THIS 5 th DAY OF MARCH, 2015 , for the reasons stated in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The rationale of the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 109), is ADOPTED ; 2. Petitioner's motion for an indicative ruling under Rule 62.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the writ has become absolute, (Doc. 107), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE ; and 3. The matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Car..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM J. NEALON, District Judge.
NOW, THIS 5th DAY OF MARCH, 2015, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum issued this date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The rationale of the Report and Recommendation, (Doc. 109), is ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner's motion for an indicative ruling under Rule 62.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that the writ has become absolute, (Doc. 107), is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
3. The matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson for further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
