STEVEN J. INC. v. LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, 1:14-CV-0474. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150623d03
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2015, upon consideration of defendant's motion (Doc. 37) for summary judgment and motion (Doc. 44) to preclude the expert testimony of David Drake ("Drake"), and upon further consideration of defendant's motions in limine to preclude evidence of damages (Doc. 48), to preclude the expert testimony of Drake as to causation and damages (Doc. 50), and to preclude the trial testimony of David Fenton (Doc 51),
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2015, upon consideration of defendant's motion (Doc. 37) for summary judgment and motion (Doc. 44) to preclude the expert testimony of David Drake ("Drake"), and upon further consideration of defendant's motions in limine to preclude evidence of damages (Doc. 48), to preclude the expert testimony of Drake as to causation and damages (Doc. 50), and to preclude the trial testimony of David Fenton (Doc 51), ..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2015, upon consideration of defendant's motion (Doc. 37) for summary judgment and motion (Doc. 44) to preclude the expert testimony of David Drake ("Drake"), and upon further consideration of defendant's motions in limine to preclude evidence of damages (Doc. 48), to preclude the expert testimony of Drake as to causation and damages (Doc. 50), and to preclude the trial testimony of David Fenton (Doc 51), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's motion (Doc. 44) to preclude the expert testimony of Drake is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks to exclude Drake's testimony as to the cause of the loss at issue in this action and DENIED as moot in all other respects.
2. Defendant's motion (Doc. 37) for summary judgment is GRANTED.
3. Defendant's motions (Docs. 48, 50, 51) in limine are DENIED as moot.
4. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of defendant and against plaintiff.
5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Source: Leagle
