SCICCHITANO v. COUNTY OF NORTHUMBERLAND, 4:15-CV-00852. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150629a70
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2015
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . AND NOW, in accordance with the memorandum of this same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. 2. The commissioners' vote to eliminate the Weatherization Department is hereby revoked. 3. Defendants are prohibited from eliminating the department on the basis of Plaintiffs' union activity. 4. Defendants are directed to apply in good faith for the state funding to operate the Weat
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . AND NOW, in accordance with the memorandum of this same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. 2. The commissioners' vote to eliminate the Weatherization Department is hereby revoked. 3. Defendants are prohibited from eliminating the department on the basis of Plaintiffs' union activity. 4. Defendants are directed to apply in good faith for the state funding to operate the Weath..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
AND NOW, in accordance with the memorandum of this same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED.
2. The commissioners' vote to eliminate the Weatherization Department is hereby revoked.
3. Defendants are prohibited from eliminating the department on the basis of Plaintiffs' union activity.
4. Defendants are directed to apply in good faith for the state funding to operate the Weatherization program.
Source: Leagle
