Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ERICKSON v. U.S., 3:14-CV-1563. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20150901c70 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 31st day of August 2015, upon consideration of defendants' motion (Doc. 15) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and in accordance with the court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 15) is GRANTED . 2. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff's FTCA c
More

ORDER

AND NOW, to wit, this 31st day of August 2015, upon consideration of defendants' motion (Doc. 15) to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, and in accordance with the court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' motion (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. 2. The motion to dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff's FTCA claim, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq. is DISMISSED and the complaint against the United States is dismissed in its entirety. 3. The motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's Bivens claim. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER judgment in favor of defendant B. Carney and against plaintiff on the Bivens claim. 5. The Clerk of Court is further directed to CLOSE this case. 6. Any appeal from this order is deemed frivolous and not in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer