Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER EDWIN M. KOSIK , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 25th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on September 28, 2015 (Doc. 232) is ADOPTED ; (2) The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 109) is DENIED without prejudice ; (3) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on October 6, 2015 (Doc. 242) is ADOPTED ; (4) The Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsiderati
Summary: ORDER EDWIN M. KOSIK , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 25th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on September 28, 2015 (Doc. 232) is ADOPTED ; (2) The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 109) is DENIED without prejudice ; (3) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on October 6, 2015 (Doc. 242) is ADOPTED ; (4) The Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideratio..
More
ORDER
EDWIN M. KOSIK, District Judge.
AND NOW, THIS 25th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on September 28, 2015 (Doc. 232) is ADOPTED;
(2) The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 109) is DENIED without prejudice;
(3) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on October 6, 2015 (Doc. 242) is ADOPTED;
(4) The Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 240) is DENIED;
(5) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on October 27, 2015 (Doc. 262) is ADOPTED;
(6) The Plaintiff's Motion to Recuse (Doc. 257) is DENIED;
(7) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on October 27, 2015 (Doc. 263) is ADOPTED;
(8) The Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Non-Final Order for Interlocutory Appeal (Doc. 259) is DENIED;
(9) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson filed on November 9, 2015 (Doc. 270) is ADOPTED;
(10) The Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from an Order (Doc. 268) is DENIED; and,
(11) The above-captioned action is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
