PORTER v. CAMERON, 3:15-CV-1625. (2016)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20160426d46
Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 25 th day of April 2016, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. 28
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , to wit, this 25 th day of April 2016, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. 28 ..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, to wit, this 25th day of April 2016, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
3. Petitioner's motion (Doc. 18) for discovery is DENIED as moot.
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Source: Leagle
