BURDYN v. OLD FORGE BOROUGH, 3:12-CV-2236. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170127h78
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 24 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2017, upon consideration of the Motions in Limine filed by Defendant Old Forge Hose &Engine Company ("OFHE"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Preclude Lay Witnesses from Testifying Regarding Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Diagnosis, or Treatment (Doc. 239) is DEFERRED. 2. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Duplicative or Cumulative Testimony from Plaintiffs Disclos
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 24 th DAY OF JANUARY, 2017, upon consideration of the Motions in Limine filed by Defendant Old Forge Hose &Engine Company ("OFHE"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Preclude Lay Witnesses from Testifying Regarding Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Diagnosis, or Treatment (Doc. 239) is DEFERRED. 2. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Duplicative or Cumulative Testimony from Plaintiffs Disclose..
More
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge.
AND NOW, THIS 24th DAY OF JANUARY, 2017, upon consideration of the Motions in Limine filed by Defendant Old Forge Hose &Engine Company ("OFHE"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Preclude Lay Witnesses from Testifying Regarding Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms, Diagnosis, or Treatment (Doc. 239) is DEFERRED.
2. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Duplicative or Cumulative Testimony from Plaintiffs Disclosed Expert Witnesses (Doc. 242) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Hindsight Evidence and Arguments (Doc. 245) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
4. OFHE's Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Claimed Emotional Distress and/or Damages Caused by Litigation and/or the Legal Process and to Preclude Plaintiffs Recovery of the Same (Doc. 247) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff will not be permitted to offer evidence of emotional distress or recover damages for the emotional distress brought about by her institution and involvement in the current action. Subject to laying the proper foundation and compliance with the Federal Rules of Evidence and this Court's other rulings, Plaintiff may present evidence of emotional distress as aresult of her involvement in the criminal proceedings and attempt to recover damages therefor.
Source: Leagle
