TROXLER v. CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., 4:16-CV-02554. (2017)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20170922d06
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . AND NOW , this 21 st day of September 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED in its Entirety; 2. Plaintiff Richard Troxler is granted leave to amend his breach of contract claim within twenty one (21) days of this Memorandum Opinion in accordance with the outlined deficiencies. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, the action will be summarily dismissed
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . AND NOW , this 21 st day of September 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED in its Entirety; 2. Plaintiff Richard Troxler is granted leave to amend his breach of contract claim within twenty one (21) days of this Memorandum Opinion in accordance with the outlined deficiencies. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, the action will be summarily dismissed ..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 21st day of September 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is GRANTED in its Entirety;
2. Plaintiff Richard Troxler is granted leave to amend his breach of contract claim within twenty one (21) days of this Memorandum Opinion in accordance with the outlined deficiencies. If no amended complaint is filed by that date, the action will be summarily dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Source: Leagle
