Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Strauser v. Mechanicsburg Learning Center, 1:17-CV-1653. (2017)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20171115e92 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 5) to dismiss filed November 3, 2017 by defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and further upon consideration of plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. 9) filed November 13, 2017, and the court noting that an amended pleading supersedes the original "in providing the blueprint for the future course of the lawsuit," Snyder v. Pascack Va
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 5) to dismiss filed November 3, 2017 by defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and further upon consideration of plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. 9) filed November 13, 2017, and the court noting that an amended pleading supersedes the original "in providing the blueprint for the future course of the lawsuit," Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hosp., 303 F.3d 271, 276 (3d Cir. 2002); see also 6 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT ET AL., FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 1476 (3d ed. 2015), and the court thus finding that the amended complaint renders the original complaint a nullity, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion (Doc. 5) to dismiss is DENIED as moot and without prejudice. 2. Defendant shall respond to the amended complaint (Doc. 9) in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer