Webb v. Oddo, 1:17-CV-321. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180201f81
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2018, upon consideration of petitioner's motion (Doc. 19) for addendum of evidence, wherein he seeks to submit additional factual arguments in support of his habeas petition, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED insofar as petitioner seeks to supplement the arguments in his habeas petition. The factual argume
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2018, upon consideration of petitioner's motion (Doc. 19) for addendum of evidence, wherein he seeks to submit additional factual arguments in support of his habeas petition, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. The motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED insofar as petitioner seeks to supplement the arguments in his habeas petition. The factual argumen..
More
ORDER
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.
AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2018, upon consideration of petitioner's motion (Doc. 19) for addendum of evidence, wherein he seeks to submit additional factual arguments in support of his habeas petition, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. The motion (Doc. 19) is GRANTED insofar as petitioner seeks to supplement the arguments in his habeas petition. The factual arguments within the motion are accepted as filed.
2. The motion (Doc. 19) is DENIED insofar as petitioner seeks immediate release from custody.
Source: Leagle
