Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Arconic Inc. v. Stokar, 1:17-CV-1644. (2018)

Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20180223g07 Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER , Chief District Judge . AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2018, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion (Doc. 48) to substitute Arconic, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(c), wherein plaintiff Arconic, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, seeks to substitute Arconic, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as plaintiff in the above-captioned action, and the court observing that the defendant concurs in the motion (Doc. 48), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1
More

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2018, upon consideration of plaintiff's motion (Doc. 48) to substitute Arconic, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(c), wherein plaintiff Arconic, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, seeks to substitute Arconic, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as plaintiff in the above-captioned action, and the court observing that the defendant concurs in the motion (Doc. 48), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. 48) to substitute parties is GRANTED. 2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate plaintiff Arconic, Inc. (Pennsylvania) as a party to the above-captioned action and substitute Arconic, Inc. (Delaware) as plaintiff. 3. Defendant's motion (Doc. 43) to dismiss is DENIED as moot.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer