Barthelemy v. Doll, 3:17cv1508. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180223g17
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 22nd day of February 2018, is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The respondents' objections (Doc. 8) to Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R are OVERRULED ; 2. Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED ; 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED to the extent that an immigration judge shall afford petitioner an individual bond hearing within 30 days of this Order; 4. The petition for writ of habeas corpus
Summary: ORDER JAMES M. MUNLEY , District Judge . AND NOW , this 22nd day of February 2018, is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The respondents' objections (Doc. 8) to Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R are OVERRULED ; 2. Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED ; 3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED to the extent that an immigration judge shall afford petitioner an individual bond hearing within 30 days of this Order; 4. The petition for writ of habeas corpus i..
More
ORDER
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of February 2018, is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The respondents' objections (Doc. 8) to Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R are OVERRULED;
2. Magistrate Judge Carlson's R&R (Doc. 7) is ADOPTED;
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is GRANTED to the extent that an immigration judge shall afford petitioner an individual bond hearing within 30 days of this Order;
4. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED in all other respects;
5. The immigration judge is directed to make an individualized inquiry into whether detention is still necessary to ensure that petitioner attends removal proceedings, and that her release will not pose a danger to the community;
6. Petitioner's first motion to expedite (Doc. 9) is DENIED as moot; and
7. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
Source: Leagle
