Hickox v. Citizens Bank, 4:17-CV-02010. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180330g84
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29 th day of March 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) for clear error and manifest injustice and noting that no objections to same have been filed, 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's March 5, 2018 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ADOPTED in its entirety; 2. Pro se Plaintiff's "Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED;
Summary: ORDER MATTHEW W. BRANN , District Judge . AND NOW, this 29 th day of March 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) for clear error and manifest injustice and noting that no objections to same have been filed, 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's March 5, 2018 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ADOPTED in its entirety; 2. Pro se Plaintiff's "Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED; ..
More
ORDER
MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 29th day of March 2018, upon review of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) for clear error and manifest injustice and noting that no objections to same have been filed,1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Magistrate Judge Martin C. Carlson's March 5, 2018 Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) is ADOPTED in its entirety;
2. Pro se Plaintiff's "Motion to Dismiss" (ECF No. 20) is GRANTED;
3. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.
FootNotes
1. When no objection is made to the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge, the court should, as a matter of good practice, "satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation." Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D.Pa. 2010) (citing Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878 (3d Cir. 1987) (explaining judges should give some review to every report and recommendation)).
Source: Leagle
