Garrett v. Brittain, 1:18-cv-0677. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180601f98
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 31, 2018
Latest Update: May 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN E. JONES, III , District Judge . NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court's memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). 3. T
Summary: ORDER JOHN E. JONES, III , District Judge . NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court's memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). 2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c). 3. Th..
More
ORDER
JOHN E. JONES, III, District Judge.
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), and in accordance with the Court's memorandum of the same date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED as time-barred by the statute of limitations. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
2. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
Source: Leagle