ORDER

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, Chief District Judge.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2018, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 16) of Magistrate Judge Joseph F. Saporito, Jr., recommending the court grant the appeal (Doc. 1) of Christine Glahn ("Glahn") from the decision of the administrative law judge ("ALJ") denying Glahn's application for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income, and remand this matter for further proceedings in accordance with sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), wherein Judge Saporito opines that the administrative law judge's decision is not "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and the court noting the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") objected to the report, (Doc. 17); see FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(2), and Glahn filed a response (Doc. 18) thereto, and following de novo review of the contested portions of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F.Supp.2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F.Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court being in agreement with Judge Saporito that the decision of the administrative law judge is not "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir. 2001), and finding Judge Saporito's analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and further finding the Commissioner's objection to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report,1 it is hereby ORDERED that: