Burnside v. Peterbilt Motors Company, 3:17-CV-2121. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180709747
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 28, 2018
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Peterbilt Motors Company's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 26), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion, (Doc. 26), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Peterbilt due to lack of personal jurisdiction. All of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Peterbilt are DI
Summary: ORDER ROBERT D. MARIANI , District Judge . AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Peterbilt Motors Company's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 26), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion, (Doc. 26), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Peterbilt due to lack of personal jurisdiction. All of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Peterbilt are DIS..
More
ORDER
ROBERT D. MARIANI, District Judge.
AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Peterbilt Motors Company's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 26), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Motion, (Doc. 26), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that it seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Peterbilt due to lack of personal jurisdiction. All of Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Peterbilt are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of personal jurisdiction.
b. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. Such denial, however, will be WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Defendant Peterbilt's right to file a subsequent motion to dismiss in the event that Plaintiffs amend their Complaint.
2. Plaintiffs MAY AMEND their Complaint with respect to Defendant Peterbilt within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. During that time, Plaintiffs may engage in limited discovery relevant to the question of whether this Court may assert personal jurisdiction over Defendant Peterbilt.
Source: Leagle
