Beam v. Clark, 1:16-cv-0690. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180731c51
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOHN E. JONES, III , District Judge . NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) and supporting memorandum (Doc. 2), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, as well as the Memorandum and Order issued on May 9, 2018 (Doc. 17), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certifica
Summary: ORDER JOHN E. JONES, III , District Judge . NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) and supporting memorandum (Doc. 2), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, as well as the Memorandum and Order issued on May 9, 2018 (Doc. 17), it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. 3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificat..
More
ORDER
JOHN E. JONES, III, District Judge.
NOW THEREFORE, upon consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) and supporting memorandum (Doc. 2), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, as well as the Memorandum and Order issued on May 9, 2018 (Doc. 17), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.
3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealabilty. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).
Source: Leagle