Breslin v. Wyrick, 12-0360. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20180823g14
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Daniel Wyrick's motion to dismiss (Document #26), the plaintiffs' response thereto (Document #62), and Mr. Wyrick's reply brief (Document #72), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Defendant Wyrick is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. 2. The defendant's request for sanctions against the plaintiffs' attorney is
Summary: ORDER LAWRENCE F. STENGEL , District Judge . AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Daniel Wyrick's motion to dismiss (Document #26), the plaintiffs' response thereto (Document #62), and Mr. Wyrick's reply brief (Document #72), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Defendant Wyrick is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice. 2. The defendant's request for sanctions against the plaintiffs' attorney is D..
More
ORDER
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2018, upon consideration of Defendant Daniel Wyrick's motion to dismiss (Document #26), the plaintiffs' response thereto (Document #62), and Mr. Wyrick's reply brief (Document #72), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
1. Defendant Wyrick is DISMISSED from this action with prejudice.
2. The defendant's request for sanctions against the plaintiffs' attorney is DENIED.
3. Defendant Wyrick's separate motion for sanctions (Document #86) is DENIED as moot.
4. Defendant Wyrick's motion to strike (Document #129) is DENIED as moot.
5. The plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a supplemental response to Defendant Wyrick's motion for sanctions (Document #131) is DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
